|
Great
Lakes and Ohio Valley
Maritime Gathering Planning Meeting
May 8, 2001
Conference Call: Minutes
Participants:
Bob
Graham, Historical Collections of the Great Lakes, Bowling Green State
U.
Jeff Gray, Underwater Archaeologist, State Historical Society of Wisconsin
Peter Engelbert, Staff Archaeologist, Maritime Heritage, Ontario Ministry
of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation
John Beck, Labor & Industrial Relations, Michigan State U.
Gail Vander Stoep, Park, Recreation & Tourism Resources, Michigan
State U.
Agenda
and Related Notes:
I.
Quick round of introductions
II. Brief
overview - of CGLC, role of gatherings (maritime gathering
specifically), current program offerings (gatherings, conference, scholarships,
awards, web presence): for review, see materials sent previously
III. Discussion
- guided by the following questions & issues
A. Review
list of potential invitees
B. Total number of participants
C. Location
D. Length and format of meeting
E. Date(s) and scheduling (within general time frame of "early
fall"
F. Guiding questions / issues
G. Inventory process (e.g., archives, collections, museums,
authors, artisans and craftspeople, cultural resources, human resources,
relevant organizations)
H. Ways to use the internet / CGLC website: http://www.greatlakes.msu.edu
I. Linking with other organizations, resources to supplement
and facilitate rather than duplicate
Preliminary
discussions, involving suggestions by all, helped the planning team to
sort out the purpose of the Gathering. As was the case with planning
the February "Mapping the Great Lakes Identity" conference,
the discussion revolved around 1) focusing the theme and purpose of the
Gathering enough so that it will serve as a "carrot," people
will see the benefit and relevance of the gathering, and will see personal
benefits of participating; 2) keeping the structure flexible enough to
allow and encourage sharing, interaction and creative discussion about
potential roles and functions of CGLC, with a focus on maritime issues.
Other specific
topics, functions, suggestions projects for the CGLC maritime group included:
developing and promoting 1) literature of the sea, 2) literature of the
Great lakes, 3) poetry (e.g., fisher poets of the NW), 4) cultural history,
particularly through oral history, because many people involved with traditional
maritime lifeways and crafts are dying.
Some "functions"
of CGLC (including the maritime group) include: 1) inventorying resources;
2) serving as a clearinghouse for resources and partnership development;
3) providing a teaching/outreach service; 4) collections development;
5) using technology support and facilitate all of the above.
Peter suggested
a possible "focused" meeting/workshop theme: developing a resource
inventory (archaeological records, maps, plans, publications, collections,
etc.), with a focus on database development and integration (such a meeting
could serve as a training workshop and working meeting). Bob supported
such an idea, indicating that identifying and evaluating database and
software programs used in different places, and identifying ways to more
effectively link/integrate these databases is needed. Q: how can we
compile inventories? how might the CGLC serve the role of clearinghouse
by providing a central website for providing links to all these varied
resources? Where might duplications occur, and what gaps need to be filled?
The team
agreed that the CGLC should focus on doing NEW things, on FILLING the
gaps rather than duplicating efforts of others. John suggested we might
approach identifying potential roles for CGLC would be to develop a "list"
of projects or information that would be useful to have, perhaps using
the following phrase as a discussion trigger: "Wouldn't it be nice
if . . . " (This mirrors the model of a "list of books of Michigan
history that don't exist" that was published about 20 years ago.)
When the
issue was raised that the CGLC needs to put more effort into including
K-12 educators in Center projects, it was suggested that perhaps we might
need a separate gathering focused on maritime outreach and public education.
Peter described
a program that he and colleagues are working on -- an Edu-kit, targeted
for grades 6-8 -- that is CD-based and incorporates photos, text, and
interactive games to introduce users to Ontario and Great Lakes maritime
history (including a shipwreck game). Perhaps this could be ready to
demonstrate during the Gathering??? A nice kick-off venue???
Program
Structure: Ultimately, it seemed
there was consensus that this first gathering should include a variety
of people involved with maritime history, culture and management, and
should incorporate a combination of structured and free-wheeling components,
to include: 1) sharing of individuals' work related to Great Lakes maritime
content; 2) initiating development of an inventory of maritime resources;
and 3) engaging everyone in a free-wheeling discussion about potential
projects, "it would be nice to have/do . . . "
While
we plan to have a "working session" during the evening, it was
suggested that we could combine it with a more social environment (where?
need to find an appropriate location, perhaps a room associated with a
coastal-based or maritime-themed restaurant?) This might include a taste-test
competition of Canadian and Wisconsin beers (any others want to get into
the fray?)
Location/Date:
It was decided that we should try to conduct the Gathering
in a coastal community, preferably one that is relatively central to the
region, and easy to get to. It was suggested that the first choice be
to schedule the Gathering immediately prior to the Association for Great
Lakes Maritime History's conference to be held in early September, 2001
in Detroit. That meeting is scheduled Sept. 6 (beginning with an evening
reception) - Sept. 8 in Roseville, MI, using the Dossin Museum and the
St. Clair Shores Public Library.
It was
decided that the first choice for the Gathering would be to schedule it
from just after lunch (about 1:00 p.m.) on Wednesday, Sept. 5, having
both afternoon and evening programs, then running until about 2:00 p.m.
on Thursday, Sept. 6.
Individuals
volunteered to check various meeting and lodging possibilities near the
Dossin Museum in Detroit, and in Windsor (see details under "Budget").
If we
use the Detroit area, perhaps we can piggy-back conference rates for the
AGLMH conference hotel (The Easton, located in Roseville, which has a
boardwalk and sports bar and is located about 20 minutes north of Detroit).
If we use the Windsor area, we may benefit with a favorable exchange rate
(and not hinder Canadian participants). [NOTE: If we use a combination
of sites, perhaps both U.S. and Canadian participants will have the advantage
of not needing approval to go international? Or maybe that would hinder
both . . . REQUESTING REACTIONS FROM THE PLANNING TEAM.]
Participants:
ACTION ITEM: Planning team members were encouraged to review
the preliminary list of potential invitees, then to revise and supplement
the list (also, help fill in contact information where possible). The
team was encouraged to include folks representing artists, musicians,
authors, cultural foodways researchers, fisherfolks, tribal representatives,
K-12 educators (EXs: Lee Murdock, Song of the Lakes ensemble, Dan Hall,
the Mehans, Yvonne Lockwood)
IV. Budget
(related to logistics in # III, especially re: policy and
procedures for subsidizing part of participants' travel costs)
Very
limited discussion other than to assign various people to check about
logistics and possible costs for meeting sites, lodging, etc.
ACTION ITEMS:
Bob Graham
will check with John Pollecek about use of Dossin Museum for meeting space.
John Beck
will check on potential use of union halls near the Dossin Museum and
AGLMH conference site (will provide information by the end of May due
to travel and other commitments prior to that time)
Gail Vander
Stoep will contact John Karry (Leamington, Ontario) about checking possibilities
for meeting and lodging sites in Windsor
Thanks were
given to all participants for donating the cost of their phone calls so
that the $100 allocated in the proposed budget can be used for other Gathering
costs.
COMMENT/REQUEST:
Please keep track of all your in-kind contributions (personal time, phone
costs for conference calls and other program planning calls, mailing or
other costs, etc.) These can be used as in-kind contributions toward
the matching funds for the NEH regional humanities center implementation
grant.
V. Where
do we go from here?
Discussion
to be continues . . . please provide comments, recommendations as they
come to you. Email is easy! My address is: vanders1@msu.edu
(comment: that's a
"one", not an "el" after the "vanders" part)
THANKS for
your interest, comments, assistance! This should be FUN! I look forward
to working with all of you as we continue planning.
LOGISTICS
INFORMATION GATHERED THUS FAR
Bob Graham
reports that we can use the Dossin Museum as a meeting space on Wednesday
afternoon for free, and on Thursday morning for $2 per person.
|